查看“TessOverman379”的源代码
←
TessOverman379
跳转至:
导航
、
搜索
因为以下原因,你没有权限编辑本页:
您刚才请求的操作只对以下1个用户组开放:
管理员
。
您可以查看并复制此页面的源代码:
This is a subject that everybody appears to be arguing about at the moment. [https://storify.com/readlinkpxjky/link-baiting-the-stairway-to-heaven-or-the-gateway Continue Reading] contains further concerning the inner workings of this concept. Everyone attempting to second-guess Googles actions - which they will Never do - and wondering whether reciprocal linking is dead, dying or if it is something worth carrying on. Nuff of the speculation. Heres the proof. Google do not like reciprocal link directories and they can sniff one particular out a mile off. There was notice the use of the past tense right here a link directory on my website until not too long ago, but I have now removed it, since it had grow to be as valuable as a chocolate teapot. While the major front page of the site has retained it really is Google PageRank of PR5, in one particular of their last updates, Google relegated that directory, which had also previously had a PR5, to a PR . Meanwhile, I had not altered my linking structure that pointed to it. I had not altered my policies either I did not link TO any PR0 websites, kept the number of links per page down to a minimum and there had been even text descriptions for each and every entry listed. Google could tell what it was and acted as they saw fit. There is no point questioning or whining about it. They can and they are doing so in order to provide greater outcomes to searchers. You can like it or lump it, but if you want them to give you decent listings, ranks or send you any visitors, their rules count. My suggestions forget *artificial* reciprocal linking entirely. The time taken to keep the directory, approve/disaprove submissions largely the latter, simply because the only individuals nevertheless asking for links are crappy PR0 websites and spammers can be much far better spent. When you want to exchange links with other internet sites, make positive you do so in a all-natural way, by which I mean write about the other site in some way and location natural links inside the body text. And think about just giving to get. By which I mean, link out to valuable issues for the edification or entertainment of your guests giving no consideration to the immediate usefulness of that link to you. What goes around will come about. The moment you are seen as beneficial, other individuals will link to you. Dig up further on our affiliated portfolio by clicking [http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/linkemporer38c/journal/view/id/54d8f9794db9215166f3bacd Lacy Journal CaringBridge]. You do then get your links "reciprocated", but it may possibly not be from the same individuals to whom you linked. That is the all-natural way of linking that Google wants to see. Do not, beneath any circumstances, preserve anything other than internal navigation that could appear like merely a list of links / link farm, due to the fact Google will discover it, will not like it and will penalize it. Reciprocal linking, in the form of lists or directories merely created for that really purpose cant do something to assist you with Google very the opposite, in truth and as a result, est mortuus. My sister discovered [http://re.vu/linkemperorhole open site in new window] by browsing the Internet. [RIP].
返回
TessOverman379
。
导航菜单
个人工具
登录
名字空间
页面
讨论
变种
查看
阅读
查看源代码
查看历史
操作
搜索
导航
首页
最近更改
随机页面
帮助
工具
链入页面
相关更改
特殊页面
页面信息