DawesMaggard565
来自NoteExpress知识库
2015年7月25日 (六) 10:41DawesMaggard565(讨论 | 贡献)的版本
- Trusting. We cant suppose there could be poor people in our idealized world; * Optimistic. How could we survive if we did not believe we really could change lives? * Sympathetic. We are most... Youd not be working at a nonprofit if there is not a love for your mission that paid for the sacrifices in pay and other benefits you could probably make available world. That says something about the kind of people we are. Many of us are * Trusting. We cannot imagine that there could be bad people within our idealized world; * Optimistic. If you believe anything at all, you will maybe hate to compare about fundable. How could we survive if we didnt believe we really could change lives? * Sympathetic. Get extra info on fundable competition by going to our lovely site. We are primarily drawn to needy causes or people; * Non-confrontational. We mostly like agreement and find agreement. * Collaborative. Our level of comfort is by using working as a team rather than going it alone. These are excellent and useful qualities to possess in the nonprofit world. However, you can find other people in your business who dont fit this description. They work more like they were in competition with everybody. Rather than trusting, they are cautious. Instead of being optimistic, theyre afraid of failure. In place of being sympathetic, theyre self-promoting. As opposed to being non-confrontational, they very stake-out and defend their turf. Instead of being collaborative, they would rather work alone remote from their colleagues. These people see their nonprofits being in competition with every other charitable and theyre positively right. But, the qualities they bring to the match can often be disruptive and unpleasant. If you do not acknowledge this, youll lose contributor pounds, volunteer obligations, membership, and patronage. This informative article will illustrate the competitive environment by which nonprofits uncharacteristically are. A subsequent article will deal with the methods you must con-sider in order to meet this problem. Where is your competition? It is coming at you from all directions * Geographic Look at the other nonprofits in your town. Are some of you fighting for the same sources? The problem is that if a donor decides, for instance, to put up a charitable trust in favor of the hospital, it is unlikely they will consider a commitment to you. This means that you should not expect good success replicating the experience, when the local library vendors a city fair due to their benefit. Be it a tsunami or Katrina, people will channel their beneficence to them in the place of you, If your national charity prevails in a time of specific need. * Category If you are a gallery, you are in competition with other museums. For example, if you are a local historic society, your constituency may reduce their aid to you if they spend a weekend in Washington, DC at the Smithsonian. Youre also in competition for support from your County Museum, State Museum, etc. * Perception As other non-profits encourage themselves in magazines, journals, updates, tv, and radio, you will find their name recognition increasing at your expense. Non-profits need to understand the significance of promoting their brand. * Economic If other non-profits can appeal expertise with higher earnings, outspend you on technology, extend their markets by advertising and public relations, and spend money on consultants, theyre positioning themselves to enjoy the rewards of those assets. There are a few techniques it is possible to beat your competitors, and create-a better atmosphere for the whole charitable community. We handle these in the article 21 Things You have to do to Keep Competitive in the 21st Century.. For extra information, we recommend people have a gaze at follow us on twitter.