<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="zh-cn">
		<id>https://www.inoteexpress.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=FilideTedford397</id>
		<title>NoteExpress知识库 - 用户贡献 [zh-cn]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=FilideTedford397"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=%E7%89%B9%E6%AE%8A:%E7%94%A8%E6%88%B7%E8%B4%A1%E7%8C%AE/FilideTedford397"/>
		<updated>2026-05-22T22:36:33Z</updated>
		<subtitle>用户贡献</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.23.6</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=FilideTedford397</id>
		<title>FilideTedford397</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=FilideTedford397"/>
				<updated>2015-02-23T18:02:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;FilideTedford397：以“This is a topic that absolutely everyone appears to be arguing about at the moment. Everybody attempting to second-guess Googles actions - which they will In no way...”为内容创建页面&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This is a topic that absolutely everyone appears to be arguing about at the moment. Everybody attempting to second-guess Googles actions - which they will In no way do - and questioning no matter whether reciprocal linking is dead, dying or if it is a thing worth carrying on. Nuff of the speculation. If you are interested in data, you will likely desire to study about [http://www.kiwibox.com/linkempereor28m/blog/entry/123250145/google-rating-without-distributing-to-google/?pPage=0 link empereor]. Heres the proof. Google do not like reciprocal link directories and they can sniff 1 out a mile off. There was notice the use of the past tense here a link directory on my site until recently, but I have now removed it, because it had turn out to be as beneficial as a chocolate teapot. Whilst the principal front page of the site has retained its Google PageRank of PR5, in one of their last updates, Google relegated that directory, which had also previously had a PR5, to a PR . Meanwhile, I had not altered my linking structure that pointed to it. I had not altered my policies either I did not link TO any PR0 sites, kept the number of links per page down to a minimum and there had been even text descriptions for each and every entry listed. Google could tell what it was and acted as they saw fit. There is no point asking yourself or whining about it. To check up additional info, please consider looking at [http://www.dipity.com/linkemperormdzyj linkemperor]. They can and they are carrying out so in order to supply better outcomes to searchers. You can like it or lump it, but if you want them to give you decent listings, ranks or send you any traffic, their guidelines count. My assistance forget *artificial* reciprocal linking entirely. The time taken to preserve the directory, approve/disaprove submissions mainly the latter, since the only men and women nevertheless asking for links are crappy PR0 sites and spammers can be much far better spent. When you want to exchange links with other sites, make sure you do so in a natural way, by which I mean write about the other web site in some way and spot natural links within the body text. And contemplate just giving to get. By which I mean, link out to useful items for the edification or entertainment of your visitors giving no consideration to the immediate usefulness of that link to you. What goes about will come around. When you are seen as valuable, other individuals will link to you. If you know anything, you will seemingly require to read about [http://scriptogr.am/slime8leaf/post/protecting-your-personal-information link emperor discount]. You do then get your links &amp;quot;reciprocated&amp;quot;, but it may not be from the exact same people to whom you linked. That is the natural way of linking that Google wants to see. Do not, below any circumstances, keep something other than internal navigation that could appear like merely a list of links / link farm, simply because Google will come across it, will not like it and will penalize it. Reciprocal linking, in the form of lists or directories merely produced for that really objective can not do anything to help you with Google quite the opposite, in reality and as a result, est mortuus. [RIP]. This pictorial [http://about.me/linkemperorsle link emperor] URL has a myriad of compelling aids for the inner workings of this belief.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>FilideTedford397</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>