<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="zh-cn">
		<id>https://www.inoteexpress.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=SaltzmanDiep526</id>
		<title>NoteExpress知识库 - 用户贡献 [zh-cn]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=SaltzmanDiep526"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=%E7%89%B9%E6%AE%8A:%E7%94%A8%E6%88%B7%E8%B4%A1%E7%8C%AE/SaltzmanDiep526"/>
		<updated>2026-05-17T01:40:56Z</updated>
		<subtitle>用户贡献</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.23.6</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=SaltzmanDiep526</id>
		<title>SaltzmanDiep526</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=SaltzmanDiep526"/>
				<updated>2015-03-22T18:14:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;SaltzmanDiep526：以“Value Earning Growth (PEG) Ratio may be the percentage of the company's P/E with its growth rate. Plenty of experts have concurred that a share is rather valued when...”为内容创建页面&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Value Earning Growth (PEG) Ratio may be the percentage of the company's P/E with its growth rate. Plenty of experts have concurred that a share is rather valued when its PEG percentage similar one. Which means that in case a stock includes a P/E of-10 with a growth rate of-10, then the stock is trading at fair value. This salient [http://www.my-moving-plans.info/what-you-need-to-know-about-certainty-ties/ What You Need To Know About Certainty Ties  Moving Plans] use with has uncountable prodound tips for the meaning behind it. Exactly how many of you've seen this sort of statement? I have seen it plenty of times and I think it's ridiculous. It is a relatively simple reasoning. Let's consider it to get a minute. The stock has to deal at a P/E of 8, If a stock will increase its earning for 8, then to reach fair price. Be taught more on the affiliated encyclopedia by browsing to [http://www.bailingjiaoyu.com/what-you-need-to-find-out-about-surety-ties/ What You Need To Find Out About Surety Ties  BAILING JIAOYU]. What about a stock with growth rate of fifty? Its fair value is just a P/E Of 5. What about a company with 000-217 growth? Oh, right. In accordance with this concept, the company should have a P/E of 0, or ineffective. Does this sound right? Heck, no. But there are always a large amount of articles regarding this PEG idea. Listed below are several sources of commonly misunderstood PEG ratio http://www.moneychimp.com/glossary/peg_ratio.htm http://www.fool.com/School/TheFoolRatio.htm http://www.investopedia.com/articles/analyst/043002.asp For a 0 development company, the fair P/E rate for the company is not 0. Instead, it's a couple of percentage above risk-free interest rate or even a twenty year treasury bond. In case a twenty year bond is yielding 4.6-liter, then a reasonable value of a common stock reaches 7.6 yield. Inverting this yield, we get a P/E ratio of 13.2. Other things is wrong with using PEG rate to look for the reasonable value of the common stock? PEG considers infinite growth rate in earning per-share. No company could grow at the sam-e rate forever. Visit [http://www.4999888.com/the-benefits-of-utilizing-a-marketing-organization/ more information] to study the reason for it. What's the fair value of the common stock using PEG proportion, if we think company A will increase at 10 rate for your next five-years and then growth slows to 14 days consistently? The answer is it can not do that. PEG ratio is way too easy to single-handedly assign a fair price for a common stock. It is misleading and only wrong to-use PEG percentage for our fair value calculation. Common sense dictates a stock with higher growth rate must be valued at a higher P/E proportion. [http://www.juhuasuanfanli.com/orange-county-california-3/ Http://Www.Linkedin.Com/Company/Orange County Seo Company] contains further about where to acknowledge it. There is nothing wrong with that. But being a fair value of the common stock using a simple PEG ratio of one is simply wrong. I don't have a precise method to assess this but an evaluation might be read on other articles called Calculating Fair Value with Growth and Fair Value with Negative Growth..&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>SaltzmanDiep526</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>