查看“MarcumRudnick554”的源代码
←
MarcumRudnick554
跳转至:
导航
、
搜索
因为以下原因,你没有权限编辑本页:
您刚才请求的操作只对以下1个用户组开放:
管理员
。
您可以查看并复制此页面的源代码:
Ready? OK. Now before I discuss the question with you, I need to ensure you understand that Im not CONTRARY to the Search Engines. Ive leaned that being against material isnt very effective. Discover more on the affiliated portfolio by clicking [http://www.eventbrite.com/o/why-you-ought-to-join-a-mastermind-group-8140208361 save on]. Anti War only promotes the idea of WAR....you have to be professional PEACE. Youll soon come to recognize Im all about developing a better web. SEARCH to-day i... I want to reveal to you the problem that made the LIGHTS on for me personally so far as Seo can be involved. Ready? OK. Now before I discuss the problem with you, I desire to make certain you realize that Im not CONTRARY to the Search Engines. Ive leaned that being against material is not very effective. Anti War simply promotes the notion of WAR....you need to be pro PEACE. Youll quickly arrived at understand I am about creating a better internet. RESEARCH today is quite barbaric, uncertain and arbitrary. Im maybe not the only person who thinks in this manner. A few years before, Mr. Bill Gates explained that Search is slow. It really doesnt occur Makes you wonder whether he was saying that because Google was kicking his butt. Or did he know something that you should know? OK...here could be the issue that turned the lights o-n for me... Why is it that the Ses DO NOT have a continuing workable definition of QUALITY? Ive wrestled with that problem for a long time. Ebay has a workable definition of quality. You can easily see the feedback rating of every member and it obviously identifies the possible danger of the deal. Amazon has a practical definition of quality. It is simple to see the ranking of the book in terms of revenue and the opinions of people whove read the book. All companies have to have a workable definition of quality. However, as it pertains to Find Engines none of these monstrocities are capable of providing us with a practical definition of quality. I wonder why that is? Every other profession includes a practical definition of quality. All of our teachers had workable definitions of quality once we were in school. Imagine how horrible college would have been if they had not? Or imagine just what a restaurant could be like if it didnt have a working definition of quality. This is actually the point. If a market does not have a practical definition of quality....how can they offer quality and related results? The most obvious logical conclusion is which they CANNOT. Just what exactly could it be then that search engines actually produce? The answer to that problem is OPTIMIZED RESULTS. And theres a distinction between QUALITY RESULTS and OPTIMIZED RESULTS. To discover more, consider checking out [http://wallinside.com/post-71579-secret-but-potent-marketing-and-advertising-weapon-revealed.html TM]. Optimized Results is a far, far cry from QUALITY. To compare additional info, consider peeping at [http://www.sodahead.com//user/profile/4080886/mastermindgroupsgym329/?editMode=true business mastermind group]. If you have an opinion about marketing, you will maybe desire to study about [http://wallinside.com/post-71595-why-you-must-tu-into-a-mastermind.html business mastermind group]. This is what the SEARCH ENGINES never want you to find out..
返回
MarcumRudnick554
。
导航菜单
个人工具
登录
名字空间
页面
讨论
变种
查看
阅读
查看源代码
查看历史
操作
搜索
导航
首页
最近更改
随机页面
帮助
工具
链入页面
相关更改
特殊页面
页面信息