查看“SeidelRembert642”的源代码

This is a subject that everybody seems to be arguing about at the moment. Everyone attempting to second-guess Googles actions - which they will By no means do - and questioning whether or not reciprocal linking is dead, dying or if it is some thing worth carrying on. Nuff of the speculation. Heres the proof. Google do not like reciprocal link directories and they can sniff 1 out a mile off. To get fresh information, please consider checking out [http://www.colourlovers.com/lover/rankingslinkjudo close remove frame]. There was notice the use of the past tense right here a link directory on my website till lately, but I have now removed it, due to the fact it had turn out to be as valuable as a chocolate teapot. While the primary front page of the web site has retained its Google PageRank of PR5, in one of their last updates, Google relegated that directory, which had also previously had a PR5, to a PR . Meanwhile, I had not altered my linking structure that pointed to it. I had not altered my policies either I did not link TO any PR0 web sites, kept the number of links per page down to a minimum and there were even text descriptions for each and every entry listed. Google could tell what it was and acted as they saw fit. There is no point asking yourself or whining about it. They can and they are performing so in order to offer far better results to searchers. This great [http://www.purevolume.com/emperorreviewslily/posts/9388405/Optimising+your+travel+site link emporor] encyclopedia has several fresh suggestions for the inner workings of this view. You can like it or lump it, but if you want them to give you decent listings, ranks or send you any site visitors, their rules count. My suggestions forget *artificial* reciprocal linking fully. Learn additional info on the affiliated use with by visiting [http://www.sodahead.com//user/profile/4002078/researchlinkskiiq/?editMode=true SodaHead.com - User 4002078]. The time taken to maintain the directory, approve/disaprove submissions largely the latter, since the only individuals nonetheless asking for links are crappy PR0 websites and spammers can be much better spent. When you want to exchange links with other websites, make confident you do so in a natural way, by which I mean write about the other web site in some way and place natural links within the body text. And take into account just giving to get. By which I mean, link out to valuable factors for the edification or entertainment of your guests giving no consideration to the instant usefulness of that link to you. What goes around will come around. I found out about [http://scriptogr.am/linkemperorigs linkemperorigs on scriptogr.am] by browsing newspapers. The moment you are observed as useful, other people will link to you. You do then get your links "reciprocated", but it may not be from the very same men and women to whom you linked. That is the natural way of linking that Google desires to see. Do not, under any circumstances, preserve anything other than internal navigation that could appear like merely a list of links / link farm, due to the fact Google will find it, wont like it and will penalize it. Reciprocal linking, in the form of lists or directories merely developed for that quite objective cant do something to aid you with Google fairly the opposite, in reality and as a result, est mortuus. [RIP].