<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="zh-cn">
		<id>https://www.inoteexpress.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=DowdenBowie695</id>
		<title>DowdenBowie695 - 版本历史</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=DowdenBowie695"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=DowdenBowie695&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-22T20:52:05Z</updated>
		<subtitle>本wiki的该页面的版本历史</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.23.6</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=DowdenBowie695&amp;diff=5257&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>DowdenBowie695：以“This is a topic that everybody appears to be arguing about at the moment. Be taught further on this partner site - Click this webpage [http://www.purevolume.com/succ...”为内容创建页面</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=DowdenBowie695&amp;diff=5257&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2015-02-23T19:36:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;以“This is a topic that everybody appears to be arguing about at the moment. Be taught further on this partner site - Click this webpage [http://www.purevolume.com/succ...”为内容创建页面&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;新页面&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;This is a topic that everybody appears to be arguing about at the moment. Be taught further on this partner site - Click this webpage [http://www.purevolume.com/successa38t/posts/9352378/Why+Link+Park+and+FFA+Submissions+Really+are+a+Bad+Idea link empereor]. Everyone attempting to second-guess Googles actions - which they will In no way do - and wondering regardless of whether reciprocal linking is dead, dying or if it is a thing worth carrying on. Nuff of the speculation. Heres the proof. Google do not like reciprocal link directories and they can sniff one out a mile off. There was notice the use of the past tense here a link directory on my web site until not too long ago, but I have now removed it, simply because it had become as useful as a chocolate teapot. While the major front page of the web site has retained it really is Google PageRank of PR5, in 1 of their last updates, Google relegated that directory, which had also previously had a PR5, to a PR . Meanwhile, I had not altered my linking structure that pointed to it. I had not altered my policies either I did not link TO any PR0 websites, kept the number of links per page down to a minimum and there were even text descriptions for each and every entry listed. Google could tell what it was and acted as they saw fit. There is no point wondering or whining about it. They can and they are carrying out so in order to give much better results to searchers. You can like it or lump it, but if you want them to give you decent listings, ranks or send you any visitors, their guidelines count. My assistance forget *artificial* reciprocal linking totally. We learned about [http://www.colourlovers.com/lover/emperorresultsrandom emperorresultsrandom : COLOURlovers] by searching Bing. The time taken to sustain the directory, approve/disaprove submissions largely the latter, due to the fact the only folks nevertheless asking for links are crappy PR0 sites and spammers can be much much better spent. When you want to exchange links with other internet sites, make confident you do so in a natural way, by which I mean write about the other website in some way and location natural links inside the body text. And think about just giving to get. By which I mean, link out to useful factors for the edification or entertainment of your guests giving no consideration to the immediate usefulness of that link to you. What goes around will come about. My dad learned about [http://www.sodahead.com//user/profile/4002078/researchlinkskiiq/?editMode=true SodaHead.com - User 4002078] by searching newspapers. As soon as you are noticed as useful, others will link to you. You do then get your links &amp;quot;reciprocated&amp;quot;, but it might not be from the identical folks to whom you linked. That is the natural way of linking that Google wants to see. Do not, beneath any circumstances, preserve anything other than internal navigation that could look like merely a list of links / link farm, simply because Google will locate it, will not like it and will penalize it. Reciprocal linking, in the form of lists or directories merely developed for that extremely objective cannot do anything to help you with Google quite the opposite, in fact and therefore, est mortuus. Discover further on this partner link - Click this website [https://storify.com/linkemperorb740/text-link-marketing-creating-the-most-of-your-budg linkemperor.com]. [RIP].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>DowdenBowie695</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>