<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="zh-cn">
		<id>https://www.inoteexpress.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=HinnantSampson463</id>
		<title>HinnantSampson463 - 版本历史</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=HinnantSampson463"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=HinnantSampson463&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-09T22:45:31Z</updated>
		<subtitle>本wiki的该页面的版本历史</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.23.6</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=HinnantSampson463&amp;diff=14367&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>HinnantSampson463：以“The Google Web page Rank algorithm, also identified as PR, seems to give far more importance to the influence of a scientific article rather than to its quoting numb...”为内容创建页面</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=HinnantSampson463&amp;diff=14367&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2015-04-16T16:35:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;以“The Google Web page Rank algorithm, also identified as PR, seems to give far more importance to the influence of a scientific article rather than to its quoting numb...”为内容创建页面&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;新页面&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The Google Web page Rank algorithm, also identified as PR, seems to give far more importance to the influence of a scientific article rather than to its quoting number. For the ones that dont know, traditionally, to measure an articles value there the approach is to have citing quantity, meaning all the instances that that post has been quoted by somebody else. The concept is that if many different folks quote an post, this signifies that this post is worth although and essential. Nicely, apparently Google isnt seeking only to this, but also to the content of the report. Researchers have discovered out that the Google algorithm, when measuring a internet web sites value , offers a systematic method to discover crucial articles . The google index proved greater that the standard method to discover the genuinely good scientific articles, that weret that considerably quoted by other individuals but which have been proven to be of a quite high worth. Sidney Redner and Pu Chen from the University of Boston and Huafeng Xie and Sergei Maslov from the National Laboratory of Brookhaven identified out that certain articles that proved to be really influential . If you are interested in illness, you will seemingly fancy to check up about [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00TNT9CZ8 how to use tree tea oil for acne]. For different ways to look at the situation, consider checking out: [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00TNT9CZ8 remove acne scars]. Like the post of Wigner and Seitz, from 1933 On the Constitution of Metallic Sodium , which is now University book typical content. This splendid [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00TNT9CZ8 treatment for acne scars] paper has diverse stirring tips for how to deal with this activity. One more example is the article of Gauber from 1963 about Photon Correlations, which obtain the Nobel Prize last year. These articles werent identified using the normal quoting algorithm, but shower up extremely higher in google and had been offered a extremely high PR. The way google does it is by permitting his spiders to dig deep into the quoting web and see how numerous times the write-up that quoted the 1st article was quoted, and so on, which means that if the report that quoted your write-up is of great value, also your post increases in value.. We found out about [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00TNT9CZ8 the tea tree oil acne] by searching the Chicago Sun-Times.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>HinnantSampson463</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>