<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="zh-cn">
		<id>https://www.inoteexpress.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=KanterLanza813</id>
		<title>KanterLanza813 - 版本历史</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=KanterLanza813"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=KanterLanza813&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-15T05:21:10Z</updated>
		<subtitle>本wiki的该页面的版本历史</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.23.6</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=KanterLanza813&amp;diff=11179&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>KanterLanza813：以“Now, theres certainly not anything wrong with this, I only believe that writers who are doing this are passing up on possible traffic and/or customers. Such source b...”为内容创建页面</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=KanterLanza813&amp;diff=11179&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2015-03-26T10:30:38Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;以“Now, theres certainly not anything wrong with this, I only believe that writers who are doing this are passing up on possible traffic and/or customers. Such source b...”为内容创建页面&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;新页面&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Now, theres certainly not anything wrong with this, I only believe that writers who are doing this are passing up on possible traffic and/or customers. Such source boxes will only benefit their site ranks in a... I run a report directory on my site, and Im seeing an ever-increasing number of articles being submitted, only for the backlink provided in the Resource Box. This is probably due to the increasing amount of PLR articles and material that is becoming available. Now, there is certainly not anything wrong with this, I just believe that authors who are doing this are missing potential traffic and/or clients. Such reference boxes will simply benefit their site rankings in any search engine that values incoming links. Browsing To [http://copytaste.com/f9694 read this] certainly provides suggestions you can use with your pastor. Is this a bad thing? No. Where theyre losing out is as follows. Much of the traffic to my article directory comes from search engines, by people searching for info on a certain topic. Now, this user types within their keywords, clicks on the search box, and is given a list of relevant sites. They selected one, and are taken to the authors article. Dig up more on [http://www.indyarocks.com/blog/2109598/Affordable-Health-Insurance-In-Michigan linklicious pro account] by browsing our influential article. They read the article about, say, snowboarding, believe This is interesting and go to the authors reference box by the end of-the article to see what else theyve to say on this subject. There, they find a link to a site advertising mobile ringers. May be the audience going to be impressed, or interested in this? Not so likely. They want to find out about snowboarding, not personalize their phone. In my opinion among three things may happen then The audience leaves the entire site in disgust. The reader clicks on a link to some relevant report. The reader clicks on the related Google AdSense or similar contextual advertising ad. They dont click the authors resource link. Clicking [http://copytaste.com/k9721 privacy] possibly provides suggestions you might give to your sister. That is a potential consumer lost, very probably for good. Yes, put a link in to your site in the source box, but many article directories allow many links, so for goodness sake put a link in that ;s linked to the article subject as well, and preferably put it in first, before you lose the client. Visit [http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/linkliciouswpdrive/ BookCrossing - linkliciouswpdrives Bookshelf] to explore the purpose of it. But my site does not have anything to do with that subject onto it Then add something that does. Put a post directory, and have the source field saying To see more articles on this issue, click here. Add a web service, and have the text say To view links to internet sites on this subject, click the link. Or simply visit ClickBank, search for related projects, and have a link to them, together with the link saying something similar to If you want to find out more on this subject, obtain this item. Ultimately, not just a direct url to the item, but a cloaked or redirected one. By doing this, you still get that url to your site that you were after actually, but, also, you have the chance to make money from your audience in a new way. A win-win situation. Plus, you dont appear to be someone basically publishing acquired information on any subject just for the benefit of the backlink it will give you. An infinitely more professional look. Isnt it worth finding the time to create greater use of ones resource field?.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>KanterLanza813</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>