<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="zh-cn">
		<id>https://www.inoteexpress.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=MortensenSoutherland526</id>
		<title>MortensenSoutherland526 - 版本历史</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=MortensenSoutherland526"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=MortensenSoutherland526&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-05-22T21:52:24Z</updated>
		<subtitle>本wiki的该页面的版本历史</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.23.6</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=MortensenSoutherland526&amp;diff=5215&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>MortensenSoutherland526：以“This is a topic that everybody appears to be arguing about at the moment. Every person attempting to second-guess Googles actions - which they will Never do - and as...”为内容创建页面</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.inoteexpress.com/wiki/index.php?title=MortensenSoutherland526&amp;diff=5215&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2015-02-23T17:28:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;以“This is a topic that everybody appears to be arguing about at the moment. Every person attempting to second-guess Googles actions - which they will Never do - and as...”为内容创建页面&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;新页面&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;This is a topic that everybody appears to be arguing about at the moment. Every person attempting to second-guess Googles actions - which they will Never do - and asking yourself whether reciprocal linking is dead, dying or if it is one thing worth carrying on. Nuff of the speculation. Heres the proof. Google do not like reciprocal link directories and they can sniff 1 out a mile off. There was notice the use of the past tense right here a link directory on my web site until lately, but I have now removed it, since it had turn into as valuable as a chocolate teapot. Whilst the principal front page of the internet site has retained it is Google PageRank of PR5, in one of their last updates, Google relegated that directory, which had also previously had a PR5, to a PR . Meanwhile, I had not altered my linking structure that pointed to it. I had not altered my policies either I did not link TO any PR0 sites, kept the number of links per page down to a minimum and there were even text descriptions for each and every entry listed. Google could tell what it was and acted as they saw fit. There is no point wondering or whining about it. Visit [http://www.dipity.com/linkemperorzryif Nymann Choi] to read how to see about it. Identify extra resources on a partner paper by clicking [http://www.purevolume.com/linkemperor27z/posts/9331484/When+Linking+Build+Effective+Anchor+And+Detailed+Text PureVolume™  Were Listening To You]. They can and they are undertaking so in order to supply greater results to searchers. To get other viewpoints, consider glancing at [http://www.purevolume.com/linkemperorinfopns/posts/9388333/How+To+Get+Link+Popularity+28Fast+Report29 logo]. You can like it or lump it, but if you want them to give you decent listings, ranks or send you any site visitors, their rules count. My assistance forget *artificial* reciprocal linking completely. The time taken to sustain the directory, approve/disaprove submissions mainly the latter, because the only people nevertheless asking for links are crappy PR0 websites and spammers can be considerably much better spent. When you want to exchange links with other internet sites, make certain you do so in a natural way, by which I mean write about the other web site in some way and place natural links within the body text. And take into account just giving to get. By which I mean, link out to helpful items for the edification or entertainment of your visitors giving no consideration to the instant usefulness of that link to you. What goes around will come around. Clicking [http://www.dipity.com/emperorresultcup792 article] maybe provides cautions you might use with your cousin. When you are noticed as helpful, other people will link to you. You do then get your links &amp;quot;reciprocated&amp;quot;, but it could not be from the exact same folks to whom you linked. That is the all-natural way of linking that Google wants to see. Do not, under any circumstances, sustain something other than internal navigation that could appear like merely a list of links / link farm, simply because Google will locate it, wont like it and will penalize it. Reciprocal linking, in the form of lists or directories merely created for that very objective cannot do anything to help you with Google quite the opposite, in reality and therefore, est mortuus. [RIP].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MortensenSoutherland526</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>