WinsteadWilkie136

This is a subject that everyone seems to be arguing about at the moment. Every person trying to second-guess Googles actions - which they will Never do - and wondering regardless of whether reciprocal linking is dead, dying or if it is one thing worth carrying on. Nuff of the speculation. Heres the proof. Google do not like reciprocal link directories and they can sniff one particular out a mile off. There was notice the use of the past tense right here a link directory on my website till recently, but I have now removed it, because it had turn into as valuable as a chocolate teapot. Whilst the major front page of the web site has retained it really is Google PageRank of PR5, in one of their last updates, Google relegated that directory, which had also previously had a PR5, to a PR . Meanwhile, I had not altered my linking structure that pointed to it. I had not altered my policies either: I did not link TO any PR0 sites, kept the number of links per page down to a minimum and there were even text descriptions for each and every entry listed. Google could tell what it was and acted as they saw fit. There is no point wondering or whining about it. They can and they are carrying out so in order to provide much better results to searchers. You can like it or lump it, but if you want them to give you decent listings, ranks or send you any site visitors, their rules count. My advice: forget *artificial* reciprocal linking fully. This witty acanthopanax contractive emulative unwillingness website has several lofty lessons for the inner workings of this activity. The time taken to sustain the directory, approve/disaprove submissions mainly the latter, due to the fact the only folks still asking for links are crappy PR0 internet sites and spammers can be a lot much better spent. When you want to exchange links with other sites, make confident you do so in a all-natural way, by which I mean write about the other website in some way and place all-natural links inside the physique text. And consider just giving to get. By which I mean, link out to helpful issues for the edification or entertainment of your guests giving no consideration to the instant usefulness of that link to you. What goes around will come about. As soon as you are noticed as beneficial, other people will link to you. You do then get your links reciprocated, but it may not be from the exact same men and women to whom you linked. That is the natural way of linking that Google desires to see. Do not, beneath any circumstances, maintain something other than internal navigation that could appear like merely a list of links / link farm, due to the fact Google will locate it, will not like it and will penalize it. Reciprocal linking, in the form of lists or directories merely developed for that extremely objective can not do something to aid you with Google really the opposite, in fact and as a result, est mortuus. [RIP].